untonuggan: balls of yarn, text reads "Dreamwidth Knitting Guild and Terrorist Society" (dreamwidth knitting)
lizcommotion ([personal profile] untonuggan) wrote2016-01-25 01:45 pm
Entry tags:

fiber geek watching dystopias

ok ok

so i'm really liking the 100 now I've gotten past the beginning, and actually now I've gotten to canon f/f pairings i'm ON BOARD.

however the thing that is bothering me with a lot of these dystopias is FIBER.

i get the whole "let us wear grungy black clothes for a cool look" thing costumers are going for, I really do.

but I feel like if no one has figured out how to manufacture new fibers (which everyone is wearing machine made stuff, so yeah?), then it should be WE MUST CONSERVE THIS AT ALL COSTS, not "rip it up all the time because arrows and pulling them out and blood and stuff."

do they have some secret stash of dead peoples' clothes somewhere from when the bomb went off? that have lasted 100 years? seriously?

has no one remembered how to mend things with a sewing needle and thread?

because otherwise, seriously, stop ripping all the fabric into gritty pieces.

(seriously, there's no *patching* on anyones' clothes in any of the societies, which you think someone would have come up with somewhere.)

./fiber rant

(i know it's tv, but. still! some dystopia somewhere should think of the clooooooooooooooooothes)
silveradept: A kodama with a trombone. The trombone is playing music, even though it is held in a rest position (Default)

[personal profile] silveradept 2016-01-28 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
This is useful. It's a pretty standard role that "it's always more complicated" than whatever's been said, so it's good to know what a pre-electric textile industry could look like, and that rectangular blobs isn't what everything would look like. would work clothes start taking on a more boxy look?

[personal profile] indywind 2016-01-29 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Historically, working clothes have been less-ornamented versions of clothes meant more for display-- or maybe it's the other way round, clothes not meant for working have been more-ornamented versions of clothes for work. The general shape, and construction methods/complexity have been, usually, substantially similar; instead, different materials are used, and non-work clothes include more additional details that don't add to functionality. This generalization is modified by other variables like wearer's class/social conditions, gender, cultural aesthetics, climate conditions, and work conditions.
Where individuals own few clothes (and occupy a relatively fixed social role), one person might use the same main garment or set of garments for both work and nonwork, and add or subtract minor elements for function or decoration --like putting on an apron for work, or jewelry for nonwork. Where there's a distinction between a working class and a leisure class, all the clothes of the leisure class tend toward a more extreme, less functional version of whatever the current cultural aesthetic is.
silveradept: A green cartoon dragon in the style of the Kenya animation, in a dancing pose. (Dragon)

[personal profile] silveradept 2016-01-29 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks. I'm sure that knowledge will rattle in my head at exactly the right time I need it to. Probably with something to do with fiction.